Workflow and content automation
A repetitive job turned into a pipeline that runs on its own: media production, posting, reporting, data entry.
Good fit when the same steps happen every day or every week and someone is doing them by hand.
Three kinds of work, each backed by something I have already built. If a service has no project next to it, I do not offer it.
A repetitive job turned into a pipeline that runs on its own: media production, posting, reporting, data entry.
Good fit when the same steps happen every day or every week and someone is doing them by hand.
An assistant that answers from your own documents, with ingestion, retrieval and an API you can put behind any interface.
Good fit when people keep asking questions that your documents already answer.
A working product from idea to store listing: database, auth, billing, deployment.
Good fit when you have an idea and need a first version real users can try.
You describe the manual process or the product. I reply with what I would build, and what I would leave out.
I build the riskiest part first, so you see it working before the rest exists.
The work arrives in small running pieces instead of one delivery at the end.
You get the code, the deployment, and notes on how to run and change it.
Anything that follows the same steps each time: assembling videos, preparing posts, filling reports, moving data between tools. Steps that need judgement can keep a human review point.
Yes. You get the code, the deployment and notes on how to run and change it.
Usually. Tell me what you use today and I will say what can be connected and what cannot.
Send a short description of the process or product. I reply with what I would build and what I would leave out.